News
According to the United Chambers of the Supreme Court of Cassation, a negative jurisdiction conflict is inadmissible if the reinstatement before the Administrative Court is late
- 09/09/2019
The United Chambers, with the Order of July 23rd 2019, no. 19893, pronounced on a reinstatement before the Administrative Court of a trial initiated before the ordinary judge, following the declination of the latter's jurisdiction.
According to the order of the United Chambers, “the administrative judge cannot raise the negative conflict of jurisdiction, if the case was not promptly reinstated before him” and, in this case, he himself, invested with the request, must consider the jurisdiction “by not precluding the previous declination and the work of another judge, since the term of the resumption term excludes the new judgment can be considered a continuation of the other”.
NEWS
The Contracting Authority enjoys wide discretion in the evaluation of technical offers
18/04/2024The Council of State, section V, in its judgement of 27 February 2024, no. 1911, rendered on the subject of tenders, reaffirmed that "the evaluation of the tenders and, likewise, the awarding of sc...
- 15/04/2024
The Court of Cassation, in its judgement of 20 March 2024, no. 7329, rendered in banking matters, ruled that "in bank account agreements, the statement of account balance has evidentiary effectiven...
- 14/03/2024
The Court of Cassation, in its Order No. 34889 of 13.12.2023, ruled that banking or financing contracts that refer to a manipulated Euribor rate through a restrictive agreement by credit instituti...