News
Approval of the Law on liability of healthcare professionals and introduction of the so-called double track
- 06/03/2017
After only 5 years since the entry into force of Law no. 189 of 2012 (so-called “Legge Balduzzi”), the Parliament has newly amended the legislation on liability of healthcare professionals, both in the civil law and in the criminal law area, with the definitive approval by the Chamber of Deputies, on 28th February, of Bill no. 259.
As to civil liability, the new Law introduces the so-called double track. Therefore, it distinguishes the liability of healthcare institutions, which is contractual as per article 1218 of the Civil Code, from the liability of healthcare professionals, which is extra-contractual as per article 2043 of the Civil Code. This means that, in case of responsibility of a healthcare professional, the burden of proof will be borne by the patient who claims to have suffered damages. The patient will also be required to give evidence of the causal link relating the conduct of the professional to the damaging event.
As regards criminal liability, instead, the new article 590-sexies of the Criminal Code punishes medical malpractice which has caused damages to a patient, only if such malpractice is gross. Therefore, healthcare professionals will not be criminally liable if they prove they have acted according to guidelines and good medical practices.
NEWS
- 14/03/2024
The Court of Cassation, in its Order No. 34889 of 13.12.2023, ruled that banking or financing contracts that refer to a manipulated Euribor rate through a restrictive agreement by credit instituti...
- 12/03/2024
The Court of Cassation, in its judgment of 26 February 2024, no. 5068, ruled that "The transfer of a professional athlete from one sports club to another, in return for payment and before the natur...
Telephone services: 28-day billing unlawful according to the Court of Cassation
29/02/2024The Court of Cassation, Sec. III, in its judgment of 15.2.2024, no. 4182, ruled that "It is a misleading practice and therefore prohibited for a telephone operator to establish a payment frequency ...