News
According to the United Chambers of the Supreme Court of Cassation, a negative jurisdiction conflict is inadmissible if the reinstatement before the Administrative Court is late
- 09/09/2019
The United Chambers, with the Order of July 23rd 2019, no. 19893, pronounced on a reinstatement before the Administrative Court of a trial initiated before the ordinary judge, following the declination of the latter's jurisdiction.
According to the order of the United Chambers, “the administrative judge cannot raise the negative conflict of jurisdiction, if the case was not promptly reinstated before him” and, in this case, he himself, invested with the request, must consider the jurisdiction “by not precluding the previous declination and the work of another judge, since the term of the resumption term excludes the new judgment can be considered a continuation of the other”.
NEWS
- 14/03/2024
The Court of Cassation, in its Order No. 34889 of 13.12.2023, ruled that banking or financing contracts that refer to a manipulated Euribor rate through a restrictive agreement by credit instituti...
- 12/03/2024
The Court of Cassation, in its judgment of 26 February 2024, no. 5068, ruled that "The transfer of a professional athlete from one sports club to another, in return for payment and before the natur...
Telephone services: 28-day billing unlawful according to the Court of Cassation
29/02/2024The Court of Cassation, Sec. III, in its judgment of 15.2.2024, no. 4182, ruled that "It is a misleading practice and therefore prohibited for a telephone operator to establish a payment frequency ...